Sergiu Nicolaescu si gibonii

6 ianuarie 2013 1 comentariu
Nepal funeral

Funeralii publice in Nepal

Nu am vazut imaginile de la crematoriu. Doar am auzit ce s-ar fi intamplat acolo. Unii faceau referire la „manifestanti” prin termenul gloata. Nu cred ca as mai fi avut stomac si pentru ei. Imi fusese deja intors pe dos de ceea ce am vazut in studiourile tv.

Nu am auzit nici macar o singura voce rationala pe sticla. Poate nu m-am uitat pe posturile corecte. Cine stie!?

In schimb am auzit pseudo argumentul legat de mantuire. Cica: daca nu este ingropat, nu mai ajunge in rai. Toata lumea parea ca ia in serios prostia asta. Sa facem cateva asumptii. Sa preupunem ca raiul ar exista si ca ar exista un zeu judecator (nu jucator, ca Basescu).

Atunci zeul ala n-ar trebui sa judece mortul dupa faptele proprii? De ce ar rata Sergiu Nicolaescu mantuirea? Ca doar nu si-a dat foc singur si nici nu se poate ingropa singur. Astea-s fapte ale altora asupra carora defunctul nu mai are niciun control. El, in cel mai bun caz, si-a dorit acest lucru si asta nu se mai poate schimba. A comis-o; daca e sa folosim un limbaj colocvial. Faptele lui s-au incheiat in momentul mortii. Tot restul sunt fapte ale celor ramasi vii.

Ce pot spune? O tara de giboni!

Stiu ca nu e frumos sa generalizez, dar cred ca nu gresesc. N-am vazut nicio licarire de ratiune si ma tem ca am intrat in noaptea polara a mintii.

Categorii:Argumentatie, Religie Etichete:

Dawkins – Ateism militant

3 septembrie 2012 Lasă un comentariu

Doar un reminder:


Pid’jin strikes again

Click pe imagine pentru a vedea întregul episod.

Fredo si Pidjin

Categorii:Uncategorized Etichete:

Bacteria responsabilă de „miracole”

20 noiembrie 2011 Lasă un comentariu

Scientific American a publicat pe 11 luna aceasta un articol de Jennifer Frazer, pe care il redau integral mai jos (pentru ca am vazut ca uneori dispar):

Miraculous Microbes: They Make Holy Statues „Bleed”–and Can Be Deadly, Too

A sinister bacterium implicated in Catholic miracles and „blood”-tainted polenta also kills coral, insects, and are even are up to no good in your contact lens case

MIRACLE-MAKER: A pigmented strain and various mutant versions of Serratia marcescens. Image: Robert Shanks, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

The Killer Bacteria Hall of Fame no doubt houses the usual suspects: Yersinia pestis, perpetrator of the Plague; Treponema pallidum, the spiral-shaped culprit in syphilis; and Vibrio cholerae, the swimmer that causes cholera. But you have probably never heard of one of the inductees.Serratia marcescens is a forgotten but ubiquitous bacterium that can produce a red pigment called prodigiosin and likes to hang out as a pink film in the shower grout and toilet bowls of less-than-scrupulously clean homes. The pigment is so persistent that giant amoebas called slime molds that dine on S. marcescens turn red just as flamingoes that eat shrimp turn pink. Yet the picture emerging of this unsung organism is increasingly sinister.

These bacterium first attracted scientific attention in early modern times when it was found oozing out of damp Italian statues, communion wafers and, of all things, polenta doing its best impersonation of „blood.” And blood it was taken to be—usually miraculously—until a pharmacist named Bartolomeo Bizio started trying to get to the bottom of what peasants declared to be an outbreak of diabolically cursed polenta in 1819.

Bizio believed a microorganism was responsible. In the test chamber, he found the bacterium happily chowing down on polenta while cranking out red pigment. Believing it to be a fungus, he named it Serratia in honor of Italian physicist Serafino Serrati, and marcescens because of the pigment’s tendency to fade or decay rapidly.

Fast forward to the middle of the 20th century. In the early 1950s the U.S. government decided it would be a good idea to use S. marcescens in a bioweapon dispersal experiment dubbed Operation Sea-Spray. They burst balloons filled with Serratia over San Francisco Bay. Chosen because the red pigment makes it easily traceable, the supposedly innocuous bacterium so generously sprinkled over the bay was subsequently linked to several respiratory infections and at least one death.

Since then the bacterium has been widely found to be an opportunistic human pathogen, capitalizing on its prowess in forming tight-knit surface communities called biofilms wherever it can. It infects urethras through catheters, lungs via respirators, and premature babies by way of hospital caregivers. S. marcescens turns out to be one of the top 10 causes of all hospital-acquired respiratory, neonatal and surgical infections, said Robert Shanks, associate professor of ophthalmology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, who studies S. marcescens.

It has also been found irritating or infecting the corneas of contact lens wearers who fail to clean their cases with enough diligence (or at all). „What I think is sort of strange about S. marcescens is so many people have them in their contact lens cases,” said Regis Kowalski, an ocular microbiologist at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Although it often lives there harmlessly, S. marcescens is the third-most common cause of ocular keratitis, a corneal infection usually caused by poorly cleaned cases.

Disturbingly, the bacterium also seems to thrive in soap and other aggressive cleaners. In your hand soap, you might have Serratia living in it,” Shanks said. „We actually had a bottle of Triton X-100 that was contaminated with it. It was really hard to believe because it’s a strong detergent.” The many hospital outbreaks of Serratia, he added, are almost always traced to contaminated cleaning solutions.

Yet S. marcescens also has a benign side. Certain strains are a normal, harmless component of mammalian guts, water and soil, and probably pose little risk to your average healthy human who cleans his or her lens case properly.

But Serratia has doubled down the menace in the past few years. Just this year, nine patients died and another 10 were sickened in Alabama by feeding tubes and bags contaminated with S. marcescens. And you may recall the debacle that ensued in 2004 when Chiron Corp. had to deep-six some 48 million doses of flu— half that year’s —at the beginning of the flu season due to unspecified contamination. The contaminant? Serratia marcescens.

And lately, rampaging Serratia have turned up in some even less expected places. In 2002 scientists discovered the „white pox” pathogen devouring elkhorn coral in the Caribbean was none other than S. marcescens. Although Serratia is a common inhabitant of beaches, canals and some shore-dwelling animals, it is not typically found in seawater, so discovering it there was a surprise, said Kathryn Sutherland, associate professor of biology at Rollins College in Winter Park, Fla., who unmasked the pathogen.

After extensive testing of Serratia strains from nearly every conceivable source, Sutherland and her colleagues concluded that the coral-killing strain was an exact match with one of the many strains found in human excrement. In a paper published in PloS ONE in August, they showed that this strain of bacteria experimentally caused white pox on elkhorn coral infected in the lab (although other factors such as another pathogen, pollution and rising water temperatures may also contribute to the disease, she noted).

Released from leaking septic systems ill-suited to the local geology of the Florida Keys, the bacterium by chance happened to be able to both survive in saltwater and dine on elkhorn coral, an unhappy accident for both us and it, because about 90 percent of the species in those waters have vanished in the last 15 years. „I call them elkhorn graveyards,” she said of the ghostly fields of departed coral.

The story does not stop there. In 2010 scientists reported a bacterium from the genus Serratia partnering with microscopic roundworms called nematodes from the genus Caenorhabditis—the genus to which C. elegans, a much-loved experimental subject, belongs—to take out insects. Recent research had already indicated C. elegans was not the sweet little free-living soil dweller scientists may long have thought they had cultured. Instead, nematodes in this genus make a living by hitching rides on insects to travel between food sources or by living on them and patiently waiting for them to die so they can feast on the corpse.

But a chance encounter revealed a darker story. Discovered accidentally in a wax moth larvae–baited nematode trap in South Africa, scientists discovered a new species of roundworm called C. briggsae had partnered with a species of Serratia. In these sorts of relationships, which also occur in other nematode genera, symbiotic bacteria are carried inside the nematode’s digestive tract, sometimes in pouches especially for the purpose.

Bacteria-loaded nematodes invade an insect through its own digestive openings or cuticle pores. Once inside, the roundworms release the bacteria, which start releasing toxins. „The bacteria does the work of the killing and changing the whole thing into a septic soup,” said Eyualem Abebe, a biologist at Elizabeth City State University in North Carolina and lead author of the study that discovered the Serratia–Caenorhabditis partnership. The nematodes, in turn, feast on the bacteria in an arrangement that could be looked at as a twisted agricultural scheme. Intriguingly, the researchers also found that by adding the requisite strain of Serratia to five other non–insect infecting Caenorhabditis species—including the venerable C. elegans—they were able to turn all these freeloaders into killers.

How is it that Serratia can survive in so many different environments and opportunistically infect so many unrelated hosts? Shanks thinks it is because Serratia is a classic bacterial generalist. It has a big genome packing enough genes to consume practically any carbon (food) source and to resist virtually any antibiotic—traits acquired through countless generations of selection in bacterial soil wars. „It’s got so many enzymes it can eat just about anything,” he said.

Which brings up one final question: Just what is that red pigment that Serratia sometimes secretes, and why does it make it? Until recently, few had bothered to investigate that question. The research of Pryce Haddix, associate professor of biology at Auburn University at Montgomery, suggests the bacterium may be using the pigment to slow energy production in the form of ATP (adenosine triphosphate) and limit damage from free radicals caused by oxygen’s presence during ATP synthesis as it prepares for rest or dormancy, he said.

But why red? Does the bloody hue have a physiologic purpose or is the bacteria’s sinister appearance merely a chemical coincidence? „That’s an excellent question,” he said. „I don’t have a clue really.”

Categorii:Religie Etichete:,

Starea De Frică – recomandare de lectură

14 noiembrie 2011 Lasă un comentariu

Un nou articol marca Max Seydlitz, „Starea De Frică„. Un scurt paragraf:

Lumea noastra a inceput sa devina din ce in ce mai mica datorita accesului la informatie. Un dezastru petrecut in Guineea Bissau devine o catastrofa locala, adusa in sufragerie de televiziune.
Latura perversa a acestui fapt este ”Starea De Frica”, cum i-a spus Michael Crichton intr-unul dintre romanele sale. Amenintarile aparent iminente ce par sa ne pandeasca zi de zi, fara nicio clipa de pauza.
Era materialul exploatat pana acum de toate religiile. Mecanismul era identic, diferenta fiind doar in detalii. Religiile identifica necesitatile fundamentale ale omului, iar apoi le scot in afara legii. Omul trebuie sa manance, sa bea, sa se inmulteasca. Asa a fost construit. De Fiinta Divina, cum ar spune Creationistii. Dar daca ne-am lua dupa logica lor, Fiinta Divina a fost cam derutata de vreme ce a prevazut organe pentru activitati ilegale. O alocare gresita de resurse. Sau o tentatie „din constructie”. De unde FD-ul ori e perversa, ori incompetenta.
Categorii:Uncategorized Etichete:

Tradiția lui Richard Dawkins

În contextul isteriei create de lunaticul Harold Camping privind sfârșitul lumii ce avea să vină pe 21 Mai anul acesta, „Washington Post” îl întreabă pe Richard Dawkins: Ce ne învață tradiția dumneavoastră despre sfârșitul lumii? Mai jos puteți găsi două paragrafe din răspunsul biologului britanic.

I won’t waste any more time on that, but I do want to mention a less trivial point arising from the question posed by the Washington Post: ‘What does your tradition teach about the end of the world?’ It’s that word ‘tradition’ that should raise our critical hackles. It refers to a collection of beliefs handed down through generations – as opposed to beliefs founded on evidence. Evidence-free beliefs are, by definition, groundless. What my ‘tradition’ (or your ‘tradition’ or the Dalai Lama’s ‘tradition’ or Osama bin Laden’s ‘tradition’ or the bad-trip ‘tradition’ of whoever wrote Revelation) says about anything in the real world (including its end) is no more likely to be true than any urban legend, idle rumor, superstition, or science fiction novel. Yet, the moment you slap the word ‘tradition’ onto a made-up story you confer on it a spurious dignity, which we are solemnly asked to ‘respect’.

Science is not a tradition, it is the organized use of evidence from the real world to make inferences about the real world – meaning the real universe, which is, in Carl Sagan’s words, all that is, or ever was, or ever will be. Science knows approximately how, and when, our Earth will end. In about five billion years the sun will run out of hydrogen, which will upset its self-regulating equilibrium; in its death-throes it will swell, and this planet will vaporise. Before that, we can expect, at unpredictable intervals measured in tens of millions of years, bombardment by dangerously large meteors or comets. Any one of these impacts could be catastrophic enough to destroy all life, as the one that killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago nearly did. In the nearer future, it is pretty likely that human life will become extinct – the fate of almost all species that have ever lived.

Puteți citi întregul articol la link-ul de mai sus.

Categorii:Scepticism Etichete:,


In weekendul asta, avand mai mult timp, am vizionat doua documentare pe care doresc sa le recomand tuturor. Primul in ordinea vizionarii a fost „The god who wasn’t there”. Filmul propriuzis este disponibil si pe youtube (o sa-l agat la final) dar recomand, daca aveti de unde lua, partea cu extended interviews.

Al doilea a fost „Religulous” al lui Bill Maher. Acesta este mult mai entertaining decat primul. La final veti gasi trailerul.

Vizionare placuta!